infolio

Chapter 7

Lucinda’s phone records filled in the next layer.

She had contacted Leah more than thirty times over three months.

At first, the calls sounded supportive.

At least according to Leah.

Lucinda told her the audit might expose Lucas.

She said she wanted to protect him from media attention.

Then the calls changed.

Leah was told she should sign updated confidentiality paperwork.

She refused.

Support payments stopped two weeks later.

Lucinda blamed the audit.

That was false.

The trust had not frozen anything.

Lucinda had personally suspended the payments.

Leah became frightened.

School tuition was due.

A medical bill for Lucas’s asthma had arrived.

Northgate offered temporary assistance conditioned on signing the relocation packet.

Leah felt cornered.

Not literally without options.

But financially pressured.

Katherine called it what it was.

“Leverage.”

Cassian’s face hardened.

Meanwhile, the crisis firm produced additional records in response to civil subpoenas.

One draft memo read:

Best-case sequence: controlled disclosure, temporary principal recusal, independent review under counsel, family stabilization.

Cassian frowned.

“Recusal from what?”

“The foundation,” Katherine said.

The foundation bylaws required any chair or family representative facing credible allegations of misuse involving personal beneficiaries to step aside during independent review.

Not permanent removal.

Temporary.

Cassian chaired the foundation.

If the documents suggested he knowingly used charitable or trust infrastructure to conceal a son, he would have to recuse himself while investigators examined the payments.

Lucinda, as vice chair for family programming, would not automatically take over.

An independent director would.

So this was not a simple power grab.

Katherine found something subtler.

Lucinda chaired the foundation’s vendor-transition committee.

That committee was responsible for supplying auditors with historic vendor records during Cassian’s recusal.

Cassian stared at her.

“She wanted custody of the documents.”

“Exactly.”

If Cassian were compromised as the apparent source of the hidden-child payments, Lucinda could position herself as the cooperative spouse helping independent auditors reconstruct her husband’s secret.

She would control which records appeared first.

Which explanations framed them.

Which legacy documents were “found.”

And critically—

she could direct attention toward Cassian’s forged authorizations before auditors traced Northgate’s ownership back to her brother.

That bought time.

Maybe enough to remove incriminating emails.

Maybe enough to settle Northgate issues quietly.

Maybe enough to shape investigators’ first theory.

Then Katherine showed him a crisis memo dated two weeks before the hotel event.

High emotional risk if C confronts Lucinda in presence of children. Avoid private setting. Public venue with cameras reduces ambiguity.

Cassian went still.

“What?”

The crisis adviser had warned Lucinda that Cassian might react violently if he learned she had hidden Lucas.

The adviser recommended controlled counsel-led disclosure.

Lucinda ignored that advice.

Instead, she chose the charity gala.

Hotel cameras.

Guests.

Foundation donors.

Press photographers in the ballroom.

Cassian thought about knocking the tray away.

Shoving her backward.

Giving her exactly the image she needed.

Katherine read another internal note written by Lucinda herself:

If he lays hands on me after I mention the boy, the board has no choice but to isolate him from the review.

Cassian stared at it.

There.

Not the whole scheme.

Enough to make him sick.

She had planned for his anger.

Maybe not the exact movement.

But she expected violence to strengthen the story.

Then Millie entered the equation unexpectedly.

Millie saw Lucas upstairs.

That created a problem.

If a six-year-old later said Lucinda had secretly brought the boy to the hotel before Cassian knew anything, Lucinda’s future claim that she merely “discovered” the situation during the audit would weaken.

So she removed Millie from sight.

Not as part of some brilliant criminal mechanism.

Because she already treated the child cruelly when inconvenient.

The existing abuse became useful.

Again.

That pattern was becoming familiar.

May you like

Lucinda did not create cruelty for the scheme.

She converted cruelty she was already willing to commit into a tool.

Related Stories

Other posts