infolio

Chapter 16 - The Sale Was Not Revenge

Genevieve told relatives I bought Bell & Finch to take it from her.

Chronology disproved.

Term sheet signed six weeks before shoe incident.

Independent committee approval three days before.

Funding wired morning of.

Closing 4:00.

Incident 4:12.

No time machine.

Still, she argued I had targeted her company months earlier because of family resentment.

Again:

conflict process mattered.

Alder Row had records showing the opportunity came through the lender’s restructuring adviser.

I initially voted:

No action due family conflict.

Committee proceeded without me after counsel confirmed permissible.

Fairness opinion.

Third-party valuation.

Genevieve’s own investors accepted because liquidation recovery likely lower.

She objected but could not block under shareholder and credit agreements.

Was $5.2 million fair?

Independent expert range:

$4.7–$5.8 million.

Yes.

No brother stealing boutique for one dollar.

Under new ownership:

Flagship remained.

Second store remained.

Third unprofitable location closed after lease negotiation.

Thirty-one of thirty-eight jobs retained initially.

Five more transitioned later.

Brand name continued for eighteen months.

Genevieve’s founder title ended.

Painful.

Commercial.

Not personal justice.

I deliberately did not become CEO.

Leah appointed an experienced retail executive.

Good.

If I had installed myself behind counter, every business decision would become sibling theater.

The store needed distance.

May you like

So did I.

────────────────────

Related Stories

Other posts