infolio

Chapter 23 - Victoria writes

Two years after the nursery incident, Victoria requested permission through counsel to send me a letter.

No contact with Leo.

I agreed to receive it.

Not because she was owed access.

Because I wanted to know whether anything had changed.

She wrote:

Ethan,

I spent a long time insisting I never intended to seriously hurt Leo.

That is true and also not enough.

Good start.

I intentionally made his care less reliable because I wanted you to believe his health was unstable.

There.

I changed bottles.

There.

I changed records.

There.

I hurt his hand to create crying that I could later describe as irritability.

There.

I used steam because I wanted him to cough.

There.

I knew those things were wrong while I was doing them.

There.

Then:

I told myself the goal was to make you reconsider an estate structure that treated me like a guest.

That was not Leo’s responsibility.

There.

She wrote about Katherine.

I resented a woman who was dead because I believed she still occupied more space in your life than I ever would.

I resented Sarah because she knew a version of you that existed before me.

I resented Leo because everyone could say he was Katherine’s without asking whether that hurt me.

Then:

None of those feelings made him unsafe. I did.

There.

About Richard:

My father gave me reasons to believe I was entitled to structural power if you loved me. Martin gave me language for turning medical uncertainty into leverage. I chose the acts.

Specific.

No absolution.

Then:

I am not asking to see Leo.

Good.

Please tell him only what is appropriate when he is old enough.

No request for forgiveness.

I put the letter in my legal archive.

Not Leo’s nursery.

Would he read it someday?

Maybe.

Not at three.

Not at ten necessarily.

A child’s right to truth is not an adult’s right to unload confession.

Timing can be ethical when it is not used to deceive.

May you like

That distinction took me years.

────────────────────

Related Stories

Other posts