infolio

Chapter 20 - The family center

The outside review of the child-and-family center found several failures.

The visit coordinator should not have accepted Vivian’s claimed schedule change without direct verification.

The electronic system allowed one caregiver to request a change without a second confirmation.

The after-hours escalation protocol was unclear.

The coordinator had too many active cases that Friday.

None of that transferred responsibility for Vivian’s later confinement to the employee.

But systems matter.

The center implemented:

Dual confirmation for placement changes.

No direct child release to a visiting relative when the order requires return through the center unless caseworker approval is documented.

Automatic supervisory alert for unreturned children.

After-hours verification numbers.

The coordinator returned to work after retraining.

I met her.

Her name was Samantha Lee.

I apologized.

“My email helped people treat you like you intentionally handed Nora into danger.”

She said:

“I made a mistake.”

“Yes.”

“I should have called Marlene.”

“Yes.”

She looked surprised.

“You’re not saying it wasn’t my fault.”

“I’m saying your error is specific.”

She nodded.

Then:

“Your wife lied to me.”

“Yes.”

“Both matter.”

There.

We had all learned specificity.

I donated no money to the center that year.

Not because I wanted punishment.

Because a donation from me during an accountability review would create unnecessary questions.

The following year, after independent recommendations were completed, my company foundation made a normal competitive grant to a different program.

No redemption check.

May you like

Sometimes money should stay out of the room.

────────────────────

Related Stories

Other posts