infolio

Chapter 25 - The shareholder fight

Aurelia’s sixteen-percent stake became the final active family conflict.

She wanted liquidity for:

Legal fees.

Restitution.

Living expenses after release.

She offered to sell eight percent back to the company.

Price:

Based on her valuation.

Special committee valuation:

Lower.

Difference:

$3.2 million.

Huge.

Why?

Aurelia’s appraiser applied a strategic premium because family shares rarely became available.

Company appraiser applied:

Minority discount.

Transfer restrictions.

Limited marketability.

Neither absurd.

Negotiations failed.

Under shareholder agreement, she could not freely sell to outsiders without offering family/company first.

She threatened arbitration.

The company agreed.

Independent arbitrator set formula-based fair value between positions.

Result:

Company repurchased six percent.

Aurelia kept ten percent.

Proceeds funded:

Restitution.

Taxes.

Legal obligations.

A reserve for civil settlement.

She remained a shareholder.

I disliked it.

May you like

Accepted it.

Ownership rules cannot become punishment tools whenever siblings hate each other.

Related Stories

Other posts