Chapter 14 - Hawthorne’s failure
Hawthorne Recovery Management faced scrutiny too.
Could it have caught Crestview earlier?
Its audits relied heavily on:
Electronic timesheets.
Provider attestations.
Quarterly patient confirmations.
Rachel had complained.
Initially, Hawthorne treated disputes as billing errors.
Why?
Crestview was approved vendor.
Vivian presented herself as family care coordinator.
Rachel’s cognitive-recovery history caused staff to seek “clarification” through Vivian.
That was wrong.
A competent adult patient’s complaint should have been addressed directly.
Then Hawthorne employee Laura Finch wrote five years earlier:
Rachel disputes 63 hours. Vivian says memory unreliable after TBI. Hold adjustment pending provider response.
No independent verification for six weeks.
Another:
Patient requesting removal of Vivian as contact. Update not yet processed.
Delay:
Twenty-three days.
During that period Crestview billed another $38,000.
Then Rachel’s attorney intervened.
Hawthorne finally suspended Crestview.
Had Hawthorne caused Nora’s kidnapping?
No.
But its failures prolonged financial conflict and reinforced Vivian’s authority.
Civil liability possible.
Then current settlement.
Hawthorne insurer reopened old case after criminal revelations.
Rachel’s estate sought damages.
So did construction defendants who had funded care account and allegedly overpaid.
Crestview dissolved.
Dean personally potentially liable.
Vivian potentially liable.
Not every dollar recoverable.
Records old.
Some services real.
Forensic accountants estimated intentional/unsupported billing:
$228,000
most defensible figure.
Not $286,400 full disputed total.
Crestview had already repaid $174,000 in old settlement.
Remaining principal dispute:
Approximately $54,000 plus investigation and legal consequences.
The fraud was not huge compared with five years of kidnapping.
May you like
That made the story worse.
A child lost five years partly because adults were fighting over an amount smaller than the house kitchen renovation.
