Chapter 16 - The recorder was corroboration, not magic

Seraphina’s attorney challenged the teddy recordings.
Expected.
Questions included:
Who activated it?
Where?
Did Seraphina have a reasonable expectation of privacy?
What state law applied?
Were any calls intercepted unlawfully?
Could edited or partial files mislead?
Prosecutors did not base the entire case on audio.
They used independent evidence.
Housekeeper testimony matched one recording.
Guest testimony matched the documentary dinner.
Phone records matched calls.
Emails matched statements.
The storage space physically existed exactly as Anouk described.
Some recordings were admitted.
Some were not used.
May you like
That was fine.
Truth does not become stronger merely because every piece of evidence appears in court.